The extension of standard rate of VAT on alterations to listed buildings was included in the recent Budget and will adversely effect many historic churches and chapels of all denominations. I have made the following submission to HMRC expressing my concerns:
" I am writing on behalf of the General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches regarding the above consultation
paper and would make the following submission.
We would wish to draw to your
attention our concerns about one particular element, the withdrawal of the
current rate VAT of zero on alterations to listed buildings. Although we are a
small denomination probably at least half of our congregations possess church
and chapel buildings that are listed. These are maintained almost entirely by
volunteers and voluntary giving.
It is ironic that at a time when we
have been working more closely than ever with English Heritage (for our English
congregations) as part of their “Caring for Places of Worship” initiative that
we find this undermined by these changes.
The consultation paper states that
“the majority of the work covered by the relief consists of extension work which
is not necessary for heritage purposes. The current rules therefore give a
perverse incentive for change as opposed to repair… Removing the zero rate
removes the perverse incentive to change listed buildings rather than repair
them and ensures that all alteration work receives the same tax treatment”.
There are major efforts to encourage the use of current and former church
buildings for community use often and this often require alteration if that
community use is to be widened – or even maintained. The consultation seems to
assume that “repair” and “alteration” are mutually-exclusive alternatives: that
is simply not always the case.
I note that it has been decided to
extend the Listed Places of Worship Grants Scheme to cover alterations and the
budget of the Scheme has been increased by £5 million for the current financial
year. However, the LPWG Scheme is already under
severe pressure and an extra £5 million will not meet the likely needs. There is
no guarantee that funding for the Scheme will be maintained at that level in
future years.
It is clear that the extension of
the 20% VAT will place burdens on already stretched churches and chapels who
have responsibilities to care for the nation’s heritage; in our case of the
dissenting and nonconformist tradition of which we are marking the
350th anniversary of this year and which has made such a contribution to
the development of British society.
I would urge that you reconsider and
that places of worship be excluded from this
change."